英文摘要 |
In contrast to traditional civil litigations, legal cases concerning infringements of patent rights show oftentimes difficulties for the claimers either to know the infringers and how their rights being impaired or to figure out whether and to what extent damages occurred. There is namely a typical situation of lack of evidence. In order to remedy this inferior position, several mechanisms under civil procedural law or special laws such as patent law are available for the possible holder of rights, while their efficiency is to be reviewed. Meanwhile, it is not to be overlooked that broadly allowing the claimers to have access to documents in possession of their opponents, even before a lawsuit being filed, means inevitably a reduction of interests of the defenders on not revealing those documents which usually contend trade secrets. Since both the effective protection of intellectual properties and the maintenance of competitive order are keys to this issue, the law should provide a protective method preventing abusive uses of the right of inspection. Taking all this into account, this article starts with reports on recent developments of German law and European legislature. Following this comparative study it argues that the relevant provisions in Taiwanese Civil Procedure Code as well as Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act are to a large extent adequate to balance the mentioned conflicting interests, while some miner ameliorations would be needed. |