英文摘要 |
It has often been noted that throughout Freud's psychoanalytical theory there is an incessant though vain quest for origin. The persistence of this desire-as it is shown in Freud's insistence on the existence and effect of primal narcissism, primal scene, primal repression, primal phantasies, and the ever-fleeting Nirvana Principle-is often understood as a structural necessity for his theory, a more that Freud has to make in order to hold all the pieces of his analyses together. Or, to put it in terms of C. S. Pierce's concept of 'abduction,' Freud's move is to generate from known facts (pathological behavior) new hypotheses (explanations for the behavior) which, though situated outside the world of observable phenomenon (behavior), can nevertheless explain the world of phenomenon (behavior). (Herein lies Freud's alleged Platonism.) In that sense, what Freud is seeking turns out to be a certain kind of empty space, not only because the origins are usually the so-called 'primal' ones which Freud himself admits to be (re-)constructions during analyses; but more importantly because the so-called origins often establish their meaning and significance only after the fact-that is, during later experiences or displaced manifestations. Interestingly, these primal concepts are intricately related to each other and all of them somehow gesture toward the common origin of human (physical and psychical) life. |