英文摘要 |
In general, the theoretical setting of legality of administrative disposition is determinedby the time point at which the disposition is taken. Accordingly, if specific administrativedisposition is illegal at the time of the deed, the agency or institution pursuing the dispositionshall proceed to withdrawal of the disposition pursuant to the rear section of Article 117 ofthe Administrative Procedure Act. In contrast, if specific administrative disposition is legalat the time of the deed but turns illegal ex post facto due to the evolution of the event inpoint or the change in the legal environment, the agency/institution pursuing the dispositionshall proceed to Article 122 or Article 123, paragraph 4 of the Administrative Procedure Act.The dualistic view of the same administrative disposition appears to be unquestionable.However, if the effect of administrative disposition is not a one time deal and should entailsustainable effect, the mechanism of revocation provided by Article 122, Article 123, paragraph4, and Article 125 of the Administrative Procedure Act may not be able to provide for therequest for return of related payment. In this paper, the content covering the mechanism ofwithdrawal of administrative disposition provided by Article 117 of the AdministrativeProcedure Act in Taiwan will be addressed. Related academic theories and insights frompractices will also be subject to analysis. In addition, the Federal Administrative ProcedureAct of Germany before and after the amendment in 1996 will also be explored. The theoriesand practices of administrative law in Germany will be studied and taken as an example ofcase study to explore the feasible solutions for the administrative agencies or institutions inhandling the aforementioned issue with an attempt to present recommendation for amendingthe law. |