英文摘要 |
Currently the evaluation of museum education programs always focuses on the number of participants, customer satisfaction, and the activity-related factors, seldom to measure the overall performance systematically. This study uses the National Science and Technology Museum as a case study by participant observation and secondary data analysis. First, it collects all indicators of education programs used in 2006-2009 and then tries to construct the Balanced Scorecard framework for the museum. Finally the study makes a comparison between the two and finds the gaps. The results show that in addition to the customer perspective (e.g. the diversity of education programs), the other three perspectives are clearly insufficient. Besides, the contextual relations of all perspectives are still lacking. For establishing a comprehensive Balanced Scorecard framework, the proposed indicators for the core business should be included and judged the priorities in the future. |