英文摘要 |
As Taiwanese society and economy change rapidly recently, Taiwan has been making a considerable progress in both quality and quantity of museums. Because of the fierce competition in the museum business, almost all the museums try their best to promote various kinds of exhibits to catch the people's attention by using all available resources from the same or different businesses like media or credit card banks. Because of rushing planning, poorly preparing, and highly commercialization and marketing exaggeration, some of the exhibits bring much disappointment and mismatch to many visitors. Moreover, the exhibit themes and contents do not fit the social expectation and value. Therefore, the topic of museum exhibit ethics has been highly emphasized and widely discussed. Moreover, most museums have started to enforce the rules for exhibit ethics internally - this is the motivation of this work. Our study focuses on the exhibit ethics recognized by the museum visitors from different aspects. We collect and review the literature related to exhibit ethics, and then design a survey questionnaire based on the following related aspects of exhibit ethics: environment, marketing, education, and service. We then conduct a survey of 191 visitors of NSTM's The Return of Sherlock Holmes: The Advances of Forensic Science to understand the extent of the exhibit ethics recognized by visitors. We use factor analysis and find out that the exhibit ethics can be mainly abstracted as the following seven factors: service, education, marketing, environment, customers' care, regulation, and security. For the education, security, and service perform well, while marketing and environment perform poorly. So, it is supposed to provide better barrier-free facilities and circulation plan to increase visitors agreement and acceptation. |