英文摘要 |
This article starts with a discussion on the definition and connotation of Ultimate Concern. By setting this as the foundation, the article goes on to explain the position/status of Ultimate Concern within the theoretical system of ethical studies, as well as its influence on an individual’s practice of ethics. Next, the article investigates Buddhism's view of Ultimate Concern. Although Buddhism does not adhere to a belief in a “ranscendent entity”, as mentioned by Paul Tillich, the Buddhist Law of Dependent Origination is transcendental. Buddhism works within an immanent framework, which does not emphasis on an actor seeking guidance or assistance from a “ranscendental entity”. Rather, it is founded upon the reality of “self-love” and the principle of “protecting life” that are in accordance with the Law of Dependent Origination. By following the thread of thoughts of “Dependent Origination, Protecting Life, Middle Path”, the theoretical system of Buddhism Life Ethics is constructed. The Law of Dependent Origination is not a “transcendental” entity. It is a law that is universal, constant and consistent in all phenomena. The Buddhist s’ Ultimate Concern is not a way of searching salvation in the “transcendental entity”. It is a path of practice that is in accordance with the teachings of Dependent Origination, Protecting Life and Middle Path. It encourages one to improve and strengthen oneself, and proceed to transcending oneself and benefiting sentient beings. Obviously, this teaching places more emphasis on the immanence of Ultimate Concern. However, one should also understand/realise that according to Buddhist philosophy there is no self-nature in all phenomena (dharma). Not only is the self-nature of the “transcendental entity” unobtainable, the self-nature of “immanence entity”(for example, the supreme-soul, great self, true mind, soul etc.) is also unobtainable. |