英文摘要 |
Three commercially available latex agglutination test (LAT) kits for the rapid identification of Campylobacter isolates were evaluated against 87 isolates of Campylobacter spp. and 46 strains of non-Campylobacter bacteria (26 species). The performance of three LAT kits, MicroScreen® Campylobacter (Merda Diagnostics, Shalford, UK), BBL Campyslide(TM) (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, MD, USA) and MERITEC(TM)-Campy (jcl) (Meridian Diagnostics, Cincinnati, OH, USA), were compared. All sensitivities for the three LAT kits were 100%. Specificities of both MicroScreen® Campylobacter and BBL Campyslide(TM) were 100% , but specificity ofMERITEC(TM)-CampyUcl) was only89.1 %. The detection limit ranges (log CFU/ml) of MicroScreen® Campylobacter, BBL Campyslide(TM) and MERITEC(TM)-Campy (jcl) against five Campylobacter strains were 7.7-9.1, 7.4-8.0 and 8.5-9.4, respectively. BBL Campyslide(TM) was more sensitive (10X) than the other two LAT kits (p < 0.01). A one-day procedure was proposed to identify the suspicious colonies on selective agar by perfonning the LAT kit, catalase, oxidase and morphological observation. |