英文摘要 |
Taiwanese businessmen have entered the Mainland China to operate finance leasing since 2010. In order to reinforce the lessee's performing ability, the leasing company and the supplier sign a repurchase agreement that is the supplier to buy the equipment back when the lessee default. Such agreement is quite common in Taiwan leasing industry, but due to misunderstanding the Mainland China judicial practice, Taiwanese businessmen suffered a loss decision of the court. What is the relationship between a finance leasing contract and repurchase agreement? Both they are under the Contract Law, but the Mainland China judicial practice treats repurchase contract as guaranteed property when supplier can buy back equipment without condition. The leasing company obtains the lessee to perform compensation, the supplier can reduce the amount of compensation to avoid double profit, and two contracts shall be prosecuted in one litigation procedure. If the supplier is not listed as a defendant in the prosecution, the supplier shall not be joined as a defendant in the oral-argument and in the appeal procedure. In addition, the terms of the repurchase agreement can advocate the freedom of contract, but cannot be inconsistent with the relevant provisions of civil enforcement, so as not to become invalid terms. Taiwanese businessmen are recommended to understand the Mainland China local judicial practice and do not assume experiences in Taiwan can be applicable in the Mainland China. |