英文摘要 |
Creativity is an important element of improvements and innovations in many professions, and technology is one of the basic elements of creativity. Furthermore, there can be no creativity without the mastery of skills. However, a conflict between these two arises in the education system of schools because focusing technology training could undermine students’ creativity. Therefore, this study takes forming creativity as an example, and explores a skill-mastery students’ evolution model for (1) forming fluency, forming flexibility, forming originality, and forming elaboration, as well as for (2) forming creativity (total scores). A total of 224 masteryskill university students in a ceramics craft course were selected from 422 ones to be the subjects. This study developed two research tools and that incorporated tests of reliability and validity. These two tools are referred to as “Evaluation list of forming creativity” and “Checklist of ceramic psychomotor forms.”. During an 18-week instruction semester of ceramic craft skill, this study used “Evaluation list of forming creativity” and “Checklist of ceramic psychomotor forms” research tools to obtain forming creativity and psychomotor forms from 224 masteryskill- student examples at the 3rd, 8th, 13th, and 18th weeks. There are two conclusions. (1) The four evolution models of forming fluency, forming flexibility, forming originality, and forming elaboration of skill-mastery students are inverse-reverse-J line type, wave line type, reverse-J line type, and line type, respectively. (2) The evolution model of forming creativity (total scores) displays a line type which is in the middle level at the beginning, maintains a plateau and slightly rises towards the end. It is suggested that teachers should strengthen learners’ forming creativity at the appropriate times during the process of learning a skill. |