英文摘要 |
This paper starts with a brief introduction of RDA, including its development, foundation and basic structure, followed by comparing the differences between RDA and AACR2 in terms of structure, contents and details of bibliographical description, including vocabularies, elements, relationship designators, replacement of GMD, transcription, etc. One of the issues discussed is the importance of applying the access point concepts in RDA into authority control. To support the implementation of the new cataloging standard, LC has revised MARC 21 for bibliographic format as well as for authority format by adding tags, subfields, indicators, codes and terms.Conclusions and suggestions are: the development of RDA will have impact not only on the core services provided by libraries but also on the application of information technology; library communities in Taiwan should follow up the global development of related issues; it is necessary to rethink how to apply RDA concepts into practice on Chinese cataloging standards and cataloging itself, building Chinese title authority database, translating vocabularies, terms and relationship designators into Chinese; libraries should collaborate with information technology communities to adapt RDA for describing and accessing resources in the future. |