消防人員學習心肺復甦術之學習量表編製與應用

Design and Application of Questionnaire on Firefighters’ CPR Skill Learning

目的：本研究旨在探討研究者所編製之學習量表對消防人員學習心肺復甦術之應用性。方法：以新北市政府消防局CPR流程評分表之得分將參加者分為高分組及低分組，並以研究者自編之學習量表做為測量工具，經過188人的預試，共回收150份有效問卷，統計軟體為IBM SPSS for Windows 20.0版，以Cronbach’s α進行內部一致性信度分析，並以探索式因素分析進行問卷效度分析，隨後製成正式學習量表。本研究正式參加者為新北市政府消防局尚未接受EMT訓練之現職消防人員，人數總計128人，共回收100份有效問卷。研究假說為經過EMT訓練後，編製後的學習量表在評估不同程度的參加者於CPR動作難易度、CPR課程知識、CPR學習態度及CPR資源支持之構面，皆有顯著差異。本研究所得結果以獨立樣本T檢定（independentsample t-tes t）與皮爾森相關分析（Pearson’s correlation analysis）來分析學習量表之應用成效。結果：研究發現高分組參加者在CPR動作難易度、CPR課程知識、CPR學習態度構面上，得分顯著高於低分組參加者，但在CPR資源支持構面上，低分組參加者有較高的得分表現。結論：研究者自編之學習量表在CPR動作難易度、CPR課程知識、CPR學習態度及CPR資源支持構面上，皆適合應用於消防人員族群。本研究所編製之正式學習量表，具有信度與效度，可供未來教學現場使用。

Purposes: The purpose of the study was to investigate the application of the CPR skill learning questionnaire on firefighters’ CPR skill learning. Methods: The primary research tools included (1) the scores obtained on CPR procedures of the New Taipei City Fire Department by participants, who were grouped into high-score and low-score groups and (2) the questionnaire designed by the researcher. The participants were 188 overall, and they provided 150 valid questionnaires for analysis in the pilot study. The software for statistical analysis used was IBM SPSS for Windows version 20.0, with Cronbach’s α and exploratory factor analysis to test for reliability and validity, respectively. The participants were firefighters who had not undergone EMT training and were serving in the New Taipei City county Fire Department. The 128 participants provided 100 valid questionnaires for analysis in the study. The hypothesis of this study was that, after EMT training, the researcher-designed learning questionnaire could evaluate the CPR skill, knowledge, attitude, and resources of the participants on different levels. An independent sample t-test and Pearson’s correlation analysis were applied to analyze the questionnaire on CPR skill learning. Results: The results showed that the high score group was significantly better at most aspects of CPR skill, knowledge, and attitude; nevertheless, the use of the bag valve mask was found to be difficult for both groups. The low score group had higher scores on CPR resources, with significant effects on the learning environment and atmosphere. Conclusions: Designed with acceptable reliability and validity, the CPR learning questionnaire was suitable for understanding firefighters’ CPR skill, knowledge, attitude, and resources. The questionnaire would therefore be a useful tool in teaching in the future.