英文摘要 |
To achieve efficiencies and save costs, some government agencies have consolidated their procurement contracts-that is, bundled or combined existing smaller contracts into fewer larger contracts. Bundling may provide substantial benefits to the government. However, bundling is necessary and justified if government would derive measurably substantial benefits. Do agencies, therefore, improperly restrain smaller business from full and open competition? Do agencies without proper reasons discriminate against smaller businesses? What are measurably substantial benefits? There is no law or regulation governing the metric and measures to evaluate the substantial benefits to the government. It becomes necessary to examine the laws and practice of the R.O.C. and the U.S. to see whether amendment to the law or regulation of the R.O.C. is required. This research on contract bundling focuses on the clauses in United States Code and the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR). Some decisions made by the Comptroller General dealing with issues in this area are discussed. This research first provides the requirement of full and open competition to see the laws and practice of these two countries. It then presents appropriate evaluation of substantial benefits from viewpoint of best practices. It also examines domestic laws, regulations, and practices of the US and the ROC regarding government procurement to see the shortcomings of Taiwan's domestic laws and regulations. This study then offers suggestions for establishing these laws and regulations. |