法教義學危機－－系統理論的解讀

Legal Dogmatics in Systems Theory

法教義學在中國法學界受到社科法學的批評乃至抨擊，實則屬於法律自治性危機的一種體現。法教義學的現有文獻，並沒有對法教義學的核心即規範問題進行充分的外部觀察。系統理論直面法律的悖論，將 法律的語義放到社會理論之中進行觀察，對探尋法教義學在現代功能分化社會中的困境和出路具有重要的理論意涵。系統理論關注法律規範本身，從法律概念的自我指涉性、法律功能的規範期望屬性以及法律開放與封閉的共生角度，從外部解讀了法教義學，並回應了當下法教義學在法律論證中面臨的困境。系統理論的區分、再入、冗餘、結構耦合等概念，均圍繞法律規範的外部觀察進行構建，對法律自治問題和法教義學的現代圖景形成了不同於以往文獻的論述，可以為這場學術爭論提供有益的智識資源。

When legal dogmatics faces the critiques from the studies of law and social science, it represents the crisis of legal autonomy in fact. The current literatures on legal dogmactics have not sufficiently observed the problem of normativity which is the central problem of legal dogmatics from the perspective of external observation. The systems theory faces the paradox of law and observes the legal semantics in social theory. Thus, it has important theoretical contribution to the dilemma and path of legal dogmatics in modern functionally differentiated society. Systems theory concerns about the legal norm itself and starts with the self-referentiality of legal concepts, the normative expectation of legal function, and the co-existence of law's openness and closure, through which it analyses the legal dogmatics from the outside and responses the dilemma in legal argumentation of the legal dogmatics. The concepts of distinction, re-entry, redundancy, and structural coupling are all constructed from the perspective of external observers of the legal norms. Systems theory formulates new arguments of legal autonomy and legal dogmatics that are different from previous literatures, and it can add new knowledge to this theoretical dispute.