英文摘要 |
Purpose: This study explores the association of the fit between desired and actual working hours, with work attitudes, focusing on the cross-national differences in terms of various types of welfare regimes. Design: Secondary analysis was employed using data collected from the International Social Survey Program (ISSP). A total of 8,525 employees from nine different countries were selected to represent four types of welfare regimes: the social democratic welfare (Denmark, Sweden, and Norway), liberal welfare (United States and Australia), conservative corporatist welfare (France and Germany), and the East Asian welfare (Taiwan and South Korea). Findings: We found that the fit between desired and actual working hours was associated with higher job satisfaction and organizational commitment. However, this association did vary across different social welfare regimes. Logistic regression further revealed that compared against the East Asian welfare regime, employees in countries with social democratic, conservative, and liberal welfare systems, were more likely to experience a fit between personal preferences and actual choices of working hours. Furthermore, after controlling for the macro-level social institutional factors and demographics, personal financial needs of "wanting to earn less" could still predict the state of misfit. Contribution: This is the first study using multiple national representative samples to test the effect of social welfare regimes on the relationship between fit of working hours and work attitudes in a global context. Organizations are thus recommended to address the balance between individual preferences and available choices by supplying multiple options to employees. |