英文摘要 |
In the litigations of insurance claims, the insurance company usually denies liability if the insured death is caused by suicide in which the basis of the legal source is according to Article 109(1)(2) of the Insurance Act, if the insured willfully commits suicide, the insurer is not obligated to pay the insured amount, but the non-forfeiture value shall be refunded to the person entitled to receive it. If an insurance contract contains a provision specifying that the insurer shall still pay the insured amount even if the insured willfully commits suicide, such a provision shall come into effect only two years after the date on which the contract is entered into. In the case of reinstatement of a suspended insurance contract, such two-year period shall commence from the date of reinstatement. In reliance on the clause that excludes coverage for 'suicide' should be written in the policy after negotiations between the parties. From the viewpoint of American laws, the terms to avoid liability on the life insurance policy have been considered as contractual words, resulting in obvious unfairness, so the insurance company has the burden of proving suicide. Moreover, such burden, requires more than proof of the act of self-destruction, the proof must further establish that the act was committed with suicidal intent, that is, the purposeful or intentional causing of death, otherwise, the terms void. This paper, thus, aims to introduce the American court's conclusion of the insured suicide not able to relieve the liability of the insurance company for our courts' reference. |