都是權控惹的禍？多元化親密伴侶暴力型態之服務挑戰－－以大台北地區聲請保護令案件為例

It is all power and control's fault: The challenges for serving clients with diversified types of intimate partner violence-The example of protection order cases in Taipei and New Taipei cities

本研究旨在了解權控型態之外親密伴侶暴力的問題成因、服務挑戰，以及現行的防治策略與制度檢討。本研究分別以個別深度訪談及焦點團體的方式進行，探討大台北地區的法官及法院社工對研究問題的看法。研究結果發現，除了權控以外，會造成親密伴侶暴力發生的原因包括：夫妻或伴侶間相處互動的議題，個人特殊議題，以及出於自我防衛所引發的暴力衝突。研究結果亦發現，法院家暴服務處的社工實務面臨以下挑戰：社工伴侶協談能力不足、「暴力」與「互動」議題的討論難以權衡、社工角色被過度期待、「被害人權益保護者」的服務價值受到挑戰、機構觀點不一難以對話。最後，本研究建議發展多元處遇模式（例如伴侶協談）以因應不同類型的親密伴侶暴力。

This research aims to understand the causes of violence, challenge of services and the current preventive strategies for cases of intimate partner violence not resulting from power and control model. The research used in-depth interview and focus groups to comprehend opinions of judges and social workers in Taipei and Taipei Cities for research questions. The research results show that the causes for the occurrence of intimate partner violence in addition to power and control model include: interaction problems between couples or partners, personal problems, and violent conflict resulted from self-defense. Research results show that there are non-power-and-control types of intimate partner violence. Research results indicate the following challenges faced by social workers in dealing with non-power-and-control type of IPV: inadequate capability of interaction, communication and consultation for social workers; hard to balance the discussion of ＂violence＂ and ＂interaction＂; excessive expectation for social worker's role; service value of ＂victim's right protector＂ being challenged; and failure of dialogue with different point of views among institutions. Based on the research findings, we suggest that multiple treatment models should be developed, such as couple consultation, to deal with different types of IPV.