英文摘要 |
In this study, we adopted two methods ‘Jaffe’s and HPLC’ and then detectored creatinine in urine. The result appeared: in the samples of healthy people aged 20-23, both of the methods had excellent line correlation and the regression was y=1.015x+0.427 (y=HPLC, x=Jaffe’s), r=0.817; in the samples from the hospital, there were quite differences between the results of the two methods, and the regression was y=0.449x +6.661, r=0.521. According to this, we can see that there are more interfering factors to the urine of the hospital patients, and the factors are apt to interfere the Jaffe’s method. So, we chose extremely different samples to make a additional recovery test, and we got the result: the average of HPLC additional recovery rate is 96.57%, standard derivation 8.795; the average of Jaffe’s method is 100.41%, standard derivation 31.616. |