月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
政大史粹 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
長時段視野下的魏晉南北朝史研究:以內藤湖南、谷川道雄、唐長孺為中心的比較
並列篇名
Research on the Six Dynasties from the Perspective of Long-Term Study: A Comparison of Naitō Konan, Tanigawa Michio, and Tang Changru
作者 林牧之 (Mu-chih Lin)
中文摘要
內藤湖南提出「唐宋時代觀」下所附帶的中國史分期論,戰後以來成為日本中國史學界的討論框架。以「貴族制」作為魏晉南北朝史(六朝史)主要命題的論點,也被戰後研究魏晉南北朝史的學者接受,並圍繞著相關主題將「六朝貴族制」的說法繼續深入討論。其中,谷川道雄尤其注意內藤湖南提出的說法,除了重視貴族的文化層面之外,更自貴族與社會層面的連結補足了內藤氏論述較不足的論點,衍生出「中世共同體」的學說,以此作為魏晉南北朝隋唐史屬於中國中世的主要註腳。唐長孺發展出唐代中後期「南朝化」理論,作為唐氏討論中國歷史發展軌跡的重要論述,同時提出了南北朝歷史路線說,闡明中國封建社會的變遷。唐氏以社會經濟的變化作為中國史分期的基準,揉合了傳統史觀與馬克思史學框架,展開對中國史長期發展趨勢的分析。本文試圖比較中日雙方的代表觀點之異同,藉此深化對魏晉南北朝史的認識。
英文摘要
In the beginning of the 20th century, Naitō Konan (1866-1934) brought up the idea of the Tang-Sung transformation and a following periodization of Chinese history (known as the “Naitō Hypothesis”). This theory became a paradigm generally accepted in the academic community of history in Japan after World War II. Following a thesis mainly concerning aristocracy, Six Dynasties scholars elaborated studies in that topic and related subjects in that period. Tanigawa Michio paid special attention to the “Naito Hypothesis,” but in addition to the cultural aspect, he also underlined the connection between the aristocratic clans and the society, to which Naito failed to give sufficient consideration. Tanigawa thus brought up the thesis of “the Middle-Age community” to support the periodization of Chinese history in which the Six Dynasties period is included in the Chinese Middle Ages. Influenced by Ch’en Yin-k’o, Tang Changru elaborated Ch’en’s theory of “South-Dynastirization” and rendered it his important approach to the periodization of Chinese history. Futher, he raised a schema of two different historical paths which the North and the South Dynasties took respectively, in order to clarify the vicissitudes of the feudal society in China. Tang took socio-economic changes as the criteria when periodizing Chinese history, combining traditional and Marxist views and studies of history. The aim of this article is to draw a comparison between the representative theories and viewpoints of the history academic circles in Japan and those in Chinese studies, whereby we may reach a deeper understanding of the Six Dynasties period.
起訖頁 1-24
關鍵詞 內藤湖南谷川道雄唐長孺中國中世南朝化Naito KonanTanigawa MichioTang ChangruChinese middle ageSouth-Dynastirization
刊名 政大史粹  
期數 201406 (26期)
出版單位 國立政治大學歷史學系
該期刊-下一篇 宋──明陳靖姑信仰的演變
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄