| 英文摘要 |
How to portray the paradoxical absurdity of being a Palestinian citizen of Israel? What is the country to which Palestinians inside Israel owe their allegiance? And to whom should Palestinian-Israelis give their loyalty? To the community of Palestinian people? Or to the state of Israel, a state which envisions itself as a Jewish state belonging to the Jewish people worldwide? Emile Habiby’s The Secret Life of Saeed:The Pessoptimist concerns itself with these complex and antagonistic questions regarding the Palestinian-Israeli identity in Israel. Habiby dramatizes the irreconcilable yet interdependent differences between Jewish Israelis and Palestinian- Israelis in the character of Saeed. The absurd situation of Palestinians living in Israel is situated in a series of binary oppositions: Palestinians/Israelis, two Yuaads/Two Saeeds, life/death, public submission/secret resistance. Habiby uses the concept of oxymoron to present the entanglement that characterizes the schizophrenic nature of such binaries. For Palestinian-Israelis to face contradictory pressures and demands internally from the Israeli government and externally from the Palestinian nationalism is enough to make one a schizophrenic. In The Pessoptimist, Habiby largely uses oxymoron to describe the sense of facing such an impasse on the part of the Palestinian citizens of Israel. In the paper, I will apply the existential- phenomenological interpretation of cultural schizophrenia to read the unresolved identity split of the Palestinian-Israelis. The first part of this article seeks to explore how the figure of oxymoron allows Habiby to describe a psychosocial phenomenon of Palestinian-Israeli identity. In the second part, I will argue that Saeed’s claim to have been saved by outer-space creatures evokes madness as a psychic reaction to Israel that treats its Palestinian citizens as enemy of the state. This article asks the following questions: Can Palestinian-Israelis be members of the Palestinian body, and be citizens of the state of Israel at the same time? Will they? Can they? How would they contribute, from their vantage point, to the destiny of the Palestinians and offer a peaceful third choice in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict? |