英文摘要 |
This article criticizes the received approach for laying out Chinese literary history into a comprehensive, chronological pattern. The author proposes that the objective foundation by which to keep literary history “literary” is to emphasize stylistic consciousness and the three stylistic levels-genre, tenor, and style-that are of structural significance in literary history. Only once a diachronic stylistics is established can issues such as criteria for classifying different periods, standards for stylistic evaluation, and joint consideration of comprehensiveness and chronology be treated appropriately. |