月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
法学家 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
民事再審發回重審的獨立特質及雙重限制模式構建
並列篇名
Independent Trait of Remanding in Civil Retrial Procedure and the Construction of Double-limited Mode
作者 李瀟瀟
中文摘要
再審程序的特性決定了再審發回重審應具有獨立的結構模式和程序品質。面對我國目前二審與再審中發回重審制度的單一運行範式及再審發回重審率在規範框架內持續走高的非合理現狀,改革的思路是:將再審發回重審與二審發回重審制度予以強制性剝離,確立再審發回重審的非依附性地位,並分別對開啟再審發回重審之門的規範性事由和再審發回重審可運行的程序性階段進行雙重限制。
英文摘要
The characteristics of the retrial procedure determines that the remanding in civil retrial procedure should has an independent structure mode and procedure installment. Facing the current situation that the remanding in second trial procedure and retrial procedure is uniform and the remand rate of retrial procedure is persistently high, we should start by reconstructing the remanding of retrial procedure if we want to accomplish the system reform of retrial procedure. Appropriate reformation of this issue is always taking the characteristics of the retrial procedure oriented and distinguishing sharply between the remanding in retrial procedure and second trial procedure, and then establishing independent standing of remanding in retrial procedure. Moreover, it is time to limit the reasons of starting remanding in retrial procedure and the judicial phases that can be remanded. Through this double-limited mode to strictly protect the reasonable running and operation of remanding in retrial procedure.
起訖頁 105-113
關鍵詞 再審發回重審發回重審事由發回重審程序階段Retrial ProcedureRemandingReasons of Starting RemandingStage for Remanding
刊名 法学家  
期數 201606 (2016:3期)
出版單位 中國人民大學
該期刊-上一篇 司法責任制改革中的法官問責--兼評《關於完善人民法院司法責任制的若干意見》
該期刊-下一篇 智慧財產權國際保護制度的新發展及中國路徑選擇
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄