月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
臺北大學法學論叢 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
我國育嬰留職停薪制度申請要件及程序之檢討——兼論育嬰之本質及責任
並列篇名
Examining the Application Requirements and Procedures of Taiwan's Unpaid Parental Leave System from the Perspective of Parental Nature and Responsibilities
作者 吳姿慧
中文摘要
我國於90年訂定性別工作平等法並建立育嬰留職停薪制度,使受僱者享有親自育兒之機會並確保其工作權益,現行法雖於近年修正頻繁,仍存若干缺失。就育嬰之本質而言,已非傳統視為個別家庭養兒育女之私事,而是孕育社會世代契約下之勞動人口,屬於國家之集體財,養育下一代乃社會全體應共同承擔之責任。育嬰留停制度應提供父母兼顧就業與家庭之選擇機會,現行法受僱滿6個月之申請門檻,應予檢討。另,育兒津貼條對父母撫育子女支出之補貼,現行法僅參加就業保險法之受僱者獲有育嬰津貼,如視育兒為社會全體應共同承擔之責任,此項制度有重新規劃之必要;此外,申請育嬰留停時,現行實施辦法之「事先」及「書面」均未臻明確,造成法院判決有不同之見解,均是未來修法應一併考慮之事項。
英文摘要
In 2001, the Taiwanese government promulgated the Act of Gender Equality in Employment and established an unpaid parental leave system, allowing employees to raise their children without losing employment rights. Although the act has been amended frequently in recent years, it has several flaws that require correction. The nature of child raising is no longer a private family affair, but has become a common responsibility for all citizens: future generations are considered as national collective goods and the primary source of labor under the concept of generational contract. A well-rounded unpaid parental leave system must provide parents with an opportunity to maintain work and family commitments. However, the Act's stipulation that employees can apply for unpaid parental leave only after 6 months of service should be revised. In addition, the Act specifies that only employees who have participated in the national employment insurance program can receive parental leave allowances, which are benefits provided to cover child-raising expenditures. Therefore, as child raising has become a common social responsibility, this regulation must be adjusted. Moreover, the Regulations for Implementing Unpaid Parental Leave for Raising Children stipulate that unpaid parental leave applicants must file an application "in writing in advance" to their employers. Unfortunately, the regulations do not clearly define this stipulation; this has led to various court judgments in related legal cases, evidencing the need for clarification in further amendments.
起訖頁 85-135
關鍵詞 育嬰留職停薪育嬰津貼性別平等社會預護社會促進父母親職時間Unpaid Parental LeaveParental Leave AllowanceGender EqualitySocial Preventive CareSocial FacilitationParental Time
刊名 臺北大學法學論叢  
期數 201606 (98期)
出版單位 國立臺北大學法律學院
該期刊-上一篇 美國法上對於公司言論自由保障之反思──論美國最高法院Citizens United v. F.E.C判決
該期刊-下一篇 私人逮捕現行犯之客觀前提要件──由德國刑事訴訟法第127條暫時逮捕之規定出發
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄