英文摘要 |
Under Delaware's fiduciary law, enhanced scrutiny, business judgment rule and entire fairness are the standards of review, in parallel to the standard of conduct such as duty of care and loyalty. With the development of Delaware case law, the core concept of enhanced scrutiny is clarified to be the scrutiny that requires the directors to show that their motivations were proper and not selfish, and their actions were reasonable in relation to their legitimate objective. In Delaware case law, enhanced scrutiny is applied to the review of defensive measures (Unocal), sale of company or control (Revlon) , deal protective measures (Omnicare) and shareholder disenfranchisement (Blasius) In respect to the defense against threats to the company, the application of enhanced scrutiny extends beyond the context of hostile takeover to the acts protecting company assets and against hedge fund activism In addition to describing the development of enhanced scrutiny in the Delaware case law. this article further applies enhanced scrutiny, as case studies, to two controversial events in Taiwan, i.e. hostile takeover of Taiwan International Securities Group by China Development Financial Holding and Orion Investment CO.’s Tender Offer to Yageo Corp. This article argues that the application of enhanced scrutiny is helpful to the development of Taiwan fiduciary law and sets up the proper the angle for the court to police directors' business decisions. Based on this belief, this article further analyzes the meaning of introducing the concept of enhanced scrutiny into our fiduciary law and the required complementary measures for doing so, poised to serve as the reference for further development of Taiwan fiduciary law. |