英文摘要 |
This study researches issues relating to corporate governance to determine the relationship between strategic leadership turnover and governance effectiveness and to further test any moderating influences from the industry factor. To improve governance effectiveness, the boards may change a CEO for poor performance; however, firms should discourage frequent CEO changes for loyalty and commitment. Hence, a CEO change may create uncertainty, which implies that strategic leadership change can be a double-edged sword to a firm. This study offers models based on the logic of transaction cost theory and organizational learning to test the hypotheses using data from 268 firms on the S&P 500 in the United States. Results indicate that strategic leadership turnover is positively related to governance effectiveness and that firms in the service sector can improve governance effectiveness more than firms in the manufacturing sector. The findings provide boards of directors with evidence as to how CEO succession influences corporate governance and how the industry effect changes such influence. |