英文摘要 |
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the welfare effects of global budget cap policies. The global budget cap policies have two remarkable features. First, the cap is fixed exogenously by the regulator. Second, there is an inverse relation between unit payment and quantities supplied. The quantity decisions of all providers together determine the relative value unit which is automatically reduced if the providers choose to supply more health services. It is obvious that a global budget creates a conflict between providers’ individual economic self-interest and their collective interest in constraining total billings within the capped budget which shares the features of common-property resources. Conventional wisdom about common-property resources predicted overuse and depletion of such a resource, the so-called “tragedy of the commons”. However, practical evidence of the provider’s utilization responses to the global cap differed notably across the countries. This paper provides a theoretical analysis of the Nash equilibrium service quantities under global budget cap policy. The effects of the medical cost, relative value unit schedule, index of profitability, and amount of global budget to the health care providers and social welfare are examined by comparative analysis. In addition, we also compare the service quantities between the Nash equilibrium and the social optimum under the global budget cap policy. Furthermore, the possibilities for health care providers to collude to gains more profits are discussed. Finally, the impact of the global budget policy on the cost of health care institutions is explored. The results of theoretical research are as follows: First, the relative value unit schedule, index of profitability, and amount of global budget have positive influences while the medical cost has negative effect on the optimum at the Nash equilibrium as well as on total social service quantities. Total social service quantities are negatively while the Nash equilibrium quantities are positively affected by the amount of health care providers. Second, Nash equilibrium service quantities are smaller than the social optimum unless the numbers of the medical care institutions are infinitely large. Third, the individual health care provider has the deviation incentive to defect the collusion. The high service quantity is the provider’s dominant strategy. Finally, the health care providers have invested in fixed equipments under fee-forservice system will face a smaller profit margin when the payment system transferred to the global budget. |