「應當參照」否議

Rejecting 'Should Consult' in Legislations

應當的規範指向是弱強行性規範，而參照的規範屬性是限制任意性規範。強行性規範不論強弱，都不應修飾、也不能修飾、更不能改變任意性規範的屬性，因此，應當無法修飾並改變參照的規範屬性。這樣，把應當與參照搭配在一起，就在形式上是非理的，實踐上也不可能是有力的。合乎邏輯的搭配結構應是或者應當依照，或者可以參照。這一有關規範詞的微觀研究說明關注法律虛詞中規範詞（關鍵詞或法眼）及其運用的研究，是法學理論和法律實踐的共同要求。The normative nature of 'should' is weak compulsory norm, whlie the normative nature of 'consult' is limiting random norm. Whether compulsory norm is strong or weak, this can't modify and change the nature of random norm, so 'should' can't modify and change the normative nature of 'consult'. In this way, we should not put 'shohld' and 'consult' together, which is unreasonable in the form and cannot be strong in practice. The collocation of the logical structure should be 'shall be in accordance with', or 'can reffer to'. These microccopic studies about code word that focus on legal function specification in word or 'clear' (keywords) and its application study are common requirement of legal theory and legal practice.