英文摘要 |
A number of more recent studies on banking performance employ the Malmquist TFP index to explore productivity change, but this index is a local technology index, thus resulting in productivity estimates potentially being biased. To remedy the existing shortcoming, this paper adopts the multiplicatively-complete Hicks-Moorsteen TFP index to investigate the domestic banking productivity change in Taiwan. The property that the product of the H-M productivity index and the terms of trade index equals the profitability index is very helpful for understanding how terms of trade change and affect a firm’s production decision. Empirical research shows that from 2005 to 2012, Taiwan’s domestic banking terms of trade continued to deteriorate, productivity was more prone to improve, but profitability often showed a decreasing trend, and therefore the change in terms of trade generally was dominating profitability. During the sample period, TFP grew notably. While TFP change in the long term was mainly from technological progress, change in the short term was closely associated with pure technical efficiency, output mix efficiency, and scale efficiency. The 2008 global financial tsunami severely affected the performance of the Taiwanese domestic banks. This paper also finds that financial holding banks outperformed independent banks in both TFP change and technological change. Finally, the statistical test shows significant differences between the Hicks-Moorsteen TFP index and the Malmquist TFP index. |