月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
中原財經法學 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
防制內線交易的危機:隱匿財報造假,內線交易無罪?
並列篇名
The Crisis of Insider Trading Prevention: The Concealment of Fraudulent Financial Reports and the Immunity from Insider Trading Liabilities
作者 賴英照
中文摘要
上市公司負責人編造假帳,因顧慮消息曝光後股價重跌遭受損失,因而在消息未公開之前,搶先賣出股票,是否構成內線交易?
有判決認為,證交法第157條之1的「重大影響股價之消息」,僅限於「未公開,但會公開的消息」。編造假帳雖為重大消息,屬於「不會公開的消息」,不在第157條之1的規範範圍之內。
另有法院認為「重大消息」並未排除所謂「不會公開的消息」。公司負責人在重大消息未公開之前買賣股票,應成立內線交易。
本文認為,內線交易的重大消息,不應將所謂「不會公開」的消息排除在規範範圍之外,否則將使內線交易的防制出現重大的疏漏。
英文摘要
Consider a corporate director who is engaged in internal accounting fraud, sells his stocks before the fraud is detected and disclosed to the public, thereby avoiding hefty losses. Is the director’s sale of stocks an insider trading? A court decision holds that the director is guilty of accounting fraud, but commits no insider trading. The court indicates that the information of accounting scandal is material, capable of adversely affecting the stock price when it is revealed, and that the director did trade on that information. However, the decision points out that the material information regulated by Art. 157-1 of the Securities Exchange Law (“the Law”) does not include the information that will not be disclosed to the investing public. Since the director is not obliged to reveal his own criminal activities under his rights against self-incrimination and freedom of speech, the information of accounting scandal will not be disclosed, and therefore not the material information covered by Art. 157-1 of the Law. According to this view, accounting fraud (or other criminal offense that would affect stock price) will provide corporate insiders with immunity from insider trading liabilities. Not all court decisions take the same position though. Several other decisions do not exclude the material information that “will not be disclosed” from the domain of Art. 157-1. This article discusses relevant decisions, analyzes different views, and concludes that corporate accounting fraud or other criminal offenses should not be a ground for insider trading immunity. To hold otherwise, salient loopholes will be created for the prevention of insider trading.
起訖頁 1-41
關鍵詞 內線交易財報造假掏空公司資產未公開的重要消息言論自由不自證己罪insider tradingfraudulent financial reportscorporate assets embezzlementundisclosed material informationfreedom of speechrights against self-incrimination
刊名 中原財經法學  
期數 201506 (34期)
出版單位 中原大學財經法律學系暨研究所
該期刊-下一篇 原住民升學優待制度的合憲性探討
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄