英文摘要 |
The classification of Chinese dialects involves many controversial issues, such as the categories, criteria, levels, and hierarchies of area classification. Regarding the local dialects of northern Guangdong (LDNG) and the local dialects of southern Hunan (LDSH), a book published and titled as Chinese Language Map clarifies the names of dialects of these regions. However, such categorizing approaches based on area terms, such as the names of northern Guangdong and southern Hunan, may lead to misidentification. Consequently, we may overlook the relationships between the local dialects in both areas. When conducting scientific research, it is necessary to establish hypotheses and clear procedures. Researchers have different goals so they employ different methodologies. It should be same when classifying dialects. Due to different emphases on ethnic grouping or area classification and different targets by the two approaches, the methodologies used to classify dialects generate qualitative discrepancies. Therefore, this study utilizes the approach of shared innovation and the sub-grouping perspectives of genetic linguistics to expound the affiliated relationship between the LDNG and LDSH. This approach can be verified through historical records. The key point is that there are uncommon aberrancy phenomena found within the initial consonant Qun and stop-plosive consonants, as well as the implication of aspirated sound consonants and the initial consonant Qun. Not only do the principles of language sub-grouping include regular operation, but they also require accompanied structure adjustment. Through the affiliation between the LDNG and LDSH, this study reveals that the identification of linguistic relationships must emphasize several profound factors tied into historical contexts. The identifications should not be limited to the external differences of areas. |