英文摘要 |
As the amount of crime gains grows larger, to hide the illegal money has become more difficult, and thus the trend of transnational concealment of the illegal money arises. The United Nations has long been award of the problems of transnational concealment of illegal money and cross-border money laundering; therefore the UNA anti-Drug Convention in 1988, UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime in 2000, and UNC convention against Corruption were enacted in 2003. These conventions not only require countries to enforce seizure and confiscation of illegal money from laundering hidden transnationally, but also encourage the joint seizure and confiscation by countries though mutual legal assistance. Moreover, the illegal money from laundering need to be returned back to victims separately. If no victim exists, then it is recommended that the money or assets recovered should be allocated per countries based on bilateral agreements. Insisting on that perpetrators should never profit from committing crimes, the US government has developed the systems of administrative, civil and criminal forfeiture, and in recent years has also further adopted stricter enforcement to track down hidden illegal money from such a crime and had the money return to victims or repatriation to victims' countries. This article has an in-depth discussion on the appropriateness of aforementioned distribution ratio of illegal money from laundering, a scrutiny of the flaws in our legal system which regulates recovery of cross-border illegal money, and finally we give an opinion regarding the feasibility in making laws of how to repatriate and allocate the illegal money recovered. |