英文摘要 |
Are social-oriented achievement motivation (SOAM) and individual-oriented achievement motivation (IOAM) independent psychological constructs that can be empirically verified and differentiated in terms of achievement-related behavior? Based upon a study where two experiments were performed using 66 undergraduates as subjects, this essay reports three findings in each case of which the level of SOAM was significant but the level of IOAM was never significant. First, when the experiment administrator provided social incentives, individuals with high SOAM were significantly more likely than individuals with low SOAM to need and hope for assistance from others in order to complete tasks. Second, when the experiment administrator continued to give more time to complete tasks, persistence was markedly higher for individuals with high levels of SOAM than for those with low levels of SOAM. Third, the ratio of task completion was markedly higher for those with high SOAM than for those with low SOAM. These research findings reflect two important points: (1) The real relationship between achievement motivation and achievement-related behavior depends on the exact nature of the context in which the individual acts. (2) External social incentives tend to stimulate SOAM, causing different types of achievement-related behavior among individuals with varying levels of SOAM. On the other hand, external social incentives are unable to arouse IOAM such that individuals with varying degrees of IOAM do not exhibit different styles of achievement-related behavior. This study, then, provides partial proof that SOAM and IOAM are indeed independent psychological constructs. The nature of Chinese achievement motivation, methodology of its measurement, and their sophisticated interrelationship with achievement-related behavior are also discussed. |