英文摘要 |
This article presents ethnographic data collected from an Amis village located on the eastern coast of Taiwan. It focuses on the nature and operation of the Amis age-set system and explores the theoretical implications of a revised view of the Amis age-set system. Previous studies of the Amis age-set system have overemphasized the formal structure of the system which is composed of hierarchically ranked age-sets. In the present study the author argues that investigating how the age organization actually operates internally not only helps us discover interconnections between this system and other villager's socio-cultural systems, but yields a more dynamic, processual approach to the entire society. To do this also requires that we understand the relationship between the age-set system and the life cycles of individual set members. This article's contribution can be summarized as follows: First, this ethnographic study offers an additional well documented to the anthropological literature on this topic. In particular it 1. demonstrates the prominent position of mama no kapah (sponsors of the youth grade) within the age-set system, 2. requires us to rethink how the power is distributed within the age organization, and 3. shows that not only is the age organization the key to the village's internal organization, but that it has mediated the village's relations with the outside society and with state organs ever since Japanese colonial rule. Secondly, instead of emphasizing the contrast between the age organization and the matrilocal (matrilineal) kinship system as a reflection of a male/female duality, the author, in making comparisons with East African Gade-type age systems, identifies the interaction between two principles of 'age' and 'generation' as the key to understanding the relationship between the age organization and other social systems. This finding may have implications for constructing a general framework within which different kinds of age systems, including age sets, age grades, graded age-sets, etc., can be compared. And, at least, from this new perspective we can reconsider the nature of the Amis kinship system and the limited functions that kin groups can perform. Finally, the discussion of the relationship between 'age' and 'generation' leads us to treat the age-set system as a part of a wider socio-cultural context and this implies that if a theory of age is a part of a theory of society, then the converse is also true. |