| 英文摘要 |
This paper deals with how different tourism images are constructed in different contexts. Unlike many previous sociological and anthropological studies of tourism, this paper focuses primarily on tourism production rather than experience in tourism. We suggest that there is a need to look into tourism production closely. Dean MacCannell’s concept of “authenticity” has been influential in the sociological and anthropological studies of tourism. His concept of “authenticity” assumes that “commercialism” is separate from “authentic culture,” or “commercialism” is even seen as decadence or death of “authentic culture.” From this point of view, modern ways of production, including tourism production, are regarded as a process of “commodification,” which, moreover, is regarded as a universalizing force in the modern world. When tourism production is seen primarily as part of this universalizing force of “commodification,” the study of tourism production no longer addresses such questions as how particular tourism production is borne out of specific socio-cultural forces. This paper deals with the guided tours that were produced by two types of institutions, namely, the Hong Kong Tourist Association (HKTA) and the Hong Kong tour operators that catered for Japanese package tourists. The comparative study aims at revealing how important particular institutional contexts are in shaping the processes of image production in tourism. We have discovered that various particular contexts have helped shape the forms and characters of the tours, upon which the particular institutional structure of the tour producers and the personal aspects of the tour guides have played a major role in the process. |