小學語文教科書插圖性別意識型態比較分析——以人教版和康軒版語文教科書為例

A Comparison of Illustration Gender Ideology in Primary School Chinese Textbooks in Mainland China and Taiwan: A Case Study of Chinese Textbooks Published by People’s Education and Kang Hsuan cation

本研究以內容分析法對大陸人教版和臺灣康軒版小學語文教科書中的插圖進行量性和質性分析，以探究兩個版本插圖所呈現的性別意識型態。通過研究分析發現：一、兩個版本教科書中男性插圖的數量遠遠多於女性插圖。二、在人物職業角色塑造上，兩個版本插圖中的男性職業角色塑造較豐富，女性職業角色顯得較為單調。三、人教版比康軒版更重視國家領袖和作戰英雄等形象的塑造。四、文中不明性別在插圖中大都表現為男性。五、兩個版本的插圖都在男女形象的刻畫上做了努力，但仍存在著社會刻板印象，體現出較強的「男主外，女主內」思想。六、插圖的性別意識型態一方面受文本的影響，另一方面，其本身也存在著較明顯的性別意識型態。最後，就男生形象而言，人教版插圖中的男生形象比康軒版的男生形象塑造得更為豐富，且在兩個版本中，女性的形象要比男性形象來的單一無趣。

This study employs content analysis to compare illustrations in Chinese textbooks published by People’s Education Press with those published by Kang Hsuan Education Press. It uses quantitative and qualitative to analyze il-lustrations of both versions to explore gender ideology. The following conclu-sions were reached as result: 1. More males are used in illustrations than fe-males in both textbook versions. 2. The professions of males are emphasized while females tend to be shown in supporting roles. 3. The Chinese textbook published by People’s Education focuses more on shaping roles like national leaders and war heroes. 4. When gender is unspecified in the text, the charac-ters shown in illustrations are generally male. 5. Both versions try to promote the equality of sexes, but social stereotypes still persist. 6. While gender ideol-ogy in illustrations is influenced by text, it takes on obvious ideological signifi-cance itself. Lastly, there is more elaboration on male roles in the Chinese textbook published by People’s Education than that published by Kang Hsuan Education. And female roles are more boring than those of males in both ver-sions.