大部制改革背景下反壟斷委員會職能完善與反壟斷法實施機制改革：歐盟與德國經驗之借鑑

Function Improvement of AMC and Implementing Mechanism Reform of AML on the Background of Institutional Restructuring : Inspirations from the Experiences of EU and Germany

2013年國務院大部制改革背景下，國務院反壟斷委員會面臨著如何完善自身職能、改革反壟斷法實施機制，在基層和在各行各業都得以深入落實的問題。歐盟和德國相關實踐中也面臨著類似問題，因而可以為我國國務院反壟斷委員會提供經驗。這些經驗將有助國務院反壟斷委員會確立中遠期改革目標，在未來五到十年裡，通過完善自身機構和人員配備，通過制度與組織創新，更有效地協調三大國務院反壟斷法執法機構執法、協調它們與地方執法機構、行業監管機構的協作，系統地開展行業調查，加快制定配套規則和指南，平衡行政執法與民事訴訟關係，改善專家的參與，更好地實現《反壟斷法》所賦職能，既服務當下的大部制改革，也創造積極條件迎接反壟斷法實施領域的大部制改革。

On the background of institutional restructuring and functional transformation of the State Council in 2013, the Chinese Commission of Antimonopoly(AMC), which is as one of the departments of China’s State Council in charging of organizing, guiding and coordinating the implementing Chinese Antimonopoly Law, is facing on the serious questing, how to reform the mechanism for implementing Chinese AML in order to make the enforcement of AML more effective on the local level and in the regulated markets. EU and Germany, whose regulation and praxis have been influencing on Chinese AML, have to manager the similar challenger. It’s suggested that their experiences may inspire AMC by NDRC, MOFCOM and SAIC better, to harmonize their relationships with local executive authorities and the other departments in charge of regulated markets, to do systematic surveying and assessing of several markets, to balance the administrative enforcement of AML and the private litigation and to improve the chances and conditions for the experts to participate in the mechanism for implementing of AML. With such systematic and future-oriented reform, AMC could realize his duties written in Art. 9 AML efficaciously, contribute to the transformation of the government’s function and make positive conditions for the institutional restructuring of China’s State Council in the future, as it will lead to reshuffle executive authorities of the AML and AMC himself.