英文摘要 |
One argument in favor of English Exit Tests (EETs) is that they motivate English majors to work harder at their courses, thereby enhancing the value of their degrees and improving their job prospects. This study examines the impact of the EET on majors’ work habits. The participants include 16 who entered a private university before the EET requirement was implemented, and 20 who entered after. Using the process model of L2 motivation (Dörnyei and Ottó, 1998), it investigates participants’ expectations and individual effort in five courses, including the departmental EET Training course and four core requirements. All participants completed a survey assessing their testing background, work habits, and perceptions of the department’s EET Training course. The two groups’ responses were compared, and three conclusions were reached. First, the post-EET participants displayed lower actional effort: they did not work as hard at the test preparation course or the core requirements. Second, the post-EET participants did not differentiate between their courses in terms of expected benefit to EET readiness. Third, the post-EET participants were less accepting of the department’s EET training requirement. They made more frequent test attempts, suggesting that the EET may have led them to try harder outside of school. However, their incentives to work at school appear to have declined. Underlying causes of these findings are explored, as are ways in which the EET could be improved to make it a better motivator. |