高中職學生家庭系統分化、自我概念對其人際衝突解決策略的預測研究─自我概念的中介效果

Prediction of Resolution Strategy for Interpersonal Conflicts Arising from Family System Differentiation and Self-Concept of High School Students: Mediational Effects of Self-Concept

本研究旨在驗證家庭系統分化對人際衝突解決策略的預測效果，並檢視自我概念的中介效果。本研 究係採用問卷調查法，並以台南縣市高中職學生為對象，共計1501人。研究工具包含「家庭系統分 化量表」、「自我概念量表」及「人際互動量表」。研究結果分二方面說明，在直接預測效果上發現： (1 )除「忍讓」策略外，「母子」、「父子」與「婚姻」次系統分化均能有效預測「競爭」、「逃避」與「協 調」策略，但其影響力各有所不同（2)各次系統分化越好，越傾向採取理智性策略；反之，則較容 易採取情緒性策略。其中值得注意的是，「婚姻」次系統分化對所有情緒性策略均具有預測力。至於 自我概念的中介效果部份，則發現:（1)在「競爭」策略上，「個人我」無中介效果存在；但「關係我」 則具有強力的中介效果。（2)在「逃避」策略上，「個人我」具有部分中介效果；但「關係我」則具 有強力的中介效果。（3)在「協調」策略上，「個人我」與「關係我」均只具有部分中介效果。（4) 在「忍讓」策略上，則「個人我」與「關係我」均無中介效果存在。此外，就整體效果而言，「關係 我」的中介效果大於「個人我」，且其影響機制主要表現在情緒性策略上。

The aim of this study was to test the effects of family system differentiation on the resolution strategy for interpersonal conflictsand to examine the mediational effects of self-concept. The study surveyed 1，501 students from senior or vocational high schools in Tainan City and County， Taiwan. The instruments used in this study included: (a) the Family System Differentiation Scale， (b) the Self-Concept Scale， and (c) the Interpersonal Interaction Scale. In terms of direct prediction effects， the results showed that: (a) Other than forbearance， mother-son， father-son and marital sub-system differentiation all effectively predicted the ''competition' ''evasion＂ and ''coordination＂ strategies， although their influence varied. (b) The better the differentiation of respective sub-systems， the more likely the rational 'coordination 〃 strategy was to be taken. Conversely， emotional ''competition＂ and 'evasion^ strategies also tended to be taken. It is particularly noteworthy that marital sub-system differentiation was predictive of all emotional strategies. The influence of father-son differentiation outperformed that of mother-son differentiation in regard to employing a rational strategy， but the reverse was true for emotional strategies. In terms of the media-tional effects of self-concept， it was found that: (a) with the competition strategy， the ' individual self ＂ had no mediational effect， whereas the ' rational self 〃 showed a strong mediational effect; (b) With the evasion strategy， the 'individual self＂ had some mediational effect， while the 'rational self ＂presented a strong mediational effect; (c) with the coordination strategy， the 'individual self 〃 and 'rational self ＂ only had a limited mediating effect; (d) With the 'forbearancev strategy， the 'individual self 〃 and 'rational self＂ did not have a mediational effect. Furthermore， as a whole， the mediational effect of 'rational self a was greater than that of 'individual self＂， and its influence mechanism was mainly applied to the emotional strategy. Implications and recommendations as well as directions for future research were discussed.