英文摘要 |
The early maxim ''Actio personalis moritur cum persona'' is used in the Common Law system (Anglo-American Law). Under this principle, when the tortfeasor is dead the action for infringement shall be terminated and the damages of the victim cannot be fully compensated. Therefore, the US, the UK and other countries that follow this legal system have regulated their survival statutes to amend the long-standing weakness existing in Common Law. However, these statutes were originally made to compensate the damages of the victim, but the matter of survival regarding the liability of punitive damages does not consider that doubt is raised when using them. At this point, there is a discussion surrounding positive and negative opinions in Common Law and most states take a negative position, which means the liability of punitive damages should be terminated when the tortfeasor is dead. It is a pity that when the punitive damages system was introduced to the Consumer Protection Act in our country, the legal systems of those countries did not completely understand that the provisions of this matter have been neglected and a positive position had been taken unreasonably by judicial practice and habits. In this regard, this study gives an analysis of the positive and negative opinions surrounding this issue in Common Law, and offers a suggestion to make a revision from the perspectives of legal policy and interpretation of the laws. This means the liability of punitive damages should be terminated when the tortfeasor is dead due to the fact that liability is specific to people and the purpose of the punitive damages system should be implemented. |