月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
興大法學 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
侵權行為人死亡後之懲罰性賠償金責任研究
並列篇名
A Study on the Liability of Punitive Damages After the Death of the Tortfeasor
作者 戴志傑
中文摘要
英美普通法早期格言認為「人之訴權,隨人之死亡而消滅」,從而侵權行為人死亡,對之所為的侵權之訴即無倖存,被害人所受之損害則無填補。於是,現今英美諸國均制訂《遺存訴因法》,以匡正普通法之缺失。然因此等法令於立法之初係基於被害人損害填補目的而設,未有思考到懲罰性賠償金之問題,從而適用上即生疑慮。對此,美國法上已有正反意見論述,且多數州係採否定立場,即侵權行為人死亡後,其懲罰性賠償金不具遺存性。然反觀我國《消費者保護法》對此問題之研究與規定卻付之闕如,從而本文即以美國法為本,試圖從法政策及法解釋角度對我國法制提出建議,即基於懲罰性賠償金制度目的及其責任專屬性,應認侵權行為人死亡後,其懲罰性賠償金責任即告消滅,原告不得在訴訟中對其繼承人或遺產管理人請求該賠償金。
英文摘要
The early maxim ''Actio personalis moritur cum persona'' is used in the Common Law system (Anglo-American Law). Under this principle, when the tortfeasor is dead the action for infringement shall be terminated and the damages of the victim cannot be fully compensated. Therefore, the US, the UK and other countries that follow this legal system have regulated their survival statutes to amend the long-standing weakness existing in Common Law. However, these statutes were originally made to compensate the damages of the victim, but the matter of survival regarding the liability of punitive damages does not consider that doubt is raised when using them. At this point, there is a discussion surrounding positive and negative opinions in Common Law and most states take a negative position, which means the liability of punitive damages should be terminated when the tortfeasor is dead. It is a pity that when the punitive damages system was introduced to the Consumer Protection Act in our country, the legal systems of those countries did not completely understand that the provisions of this matter have been neglected and a positive position had been taken unreasonably by judicial practice and habits. In this regard, this study gives an analysis of the positive and negative opinions surrounding this issue in Common Law, and offers a suggestion to make a revision from the perspectives of legal policy and interpretation of the laws. This means the liability of punitive damages should be terminated when the tortfeasor is dead due to the fact that liability is specific to people and the purpose of the punitive damages system should be implemented.
起訖頁 113-161
關鍵詞 侵權行為遺存訴因法承受訴訟填補性賠償金懲罰性賠償金消費者保護法TortSurvival StatutesAssumption of ActionCompensatory DamagesPunitive damagesConsumer Protection Law
刊名 興大法學  
期數 202105 (29期)
出版單位 國立中興大學財經法律學系、科技法律研究所
該期刊-上一篇 行政執行之救濟──以最高行政法院107年4月份第1次、107年10月份第2次庭長法官聯席會議決議為中心
該期刊-下一篇 論「輕率」或「重大過失」在經濟刑法中之運用──以德國刑法典第261條第5項「輕率洗錢罪」為例
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄