月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
篇名
淺析舉證責任倒置制度於RCA判決中之適用
並列篇名
A Brief Analysis of the Application of Reverse Burden of Proof in RCA Case
作者 王毓正
中文摘要 RCA訴訟是我國第一宗公害團體訴訟。由於污染排放行為發生距今久遠,加上毒物研究上的侷限,導致污染物與疾病間之因果關係難以明確。此關乎本件訴訟原告損害賠償請求能否成立之主要關鍵,自然即成為本件訴訟的攻防重點。究應如同一般訴訟由原告負舉證責任,或應轉而由相關資訊掌握有優勢的被告來負擔舉證之責,是本件訴訟核心爭點之一。法院於本案雖有援引民事訴訟法第二七七條但書之規定,但真否即為舉證責任倒置適用於本案,似不無疑問。
英文摘要 The RCA Case is the first environmental litigation by means of class-action in legal history of Taiwan. Owing to the Occurrence of contamination long ago and the limitation of research for typical diseases of the related Toxics in this case, the causation between the related toxics and diseases in this case is difficult to clarify. It became one of the main issues therefore, if the plaintiff shall carry the burden of proof for the causation just as the common case, or the defendant more capable of providing those related information shall carry the burden of proof. Although the court referred the Proviso in Art 277 of Code of Civil Procedure, which is deemed as legal basis of Reverse Burden of Proof, whether the court applied it indeed in this case, this article remains skeptical.
起訖頁 31-44
關鍵詞 RCA訴訟舉證責任舉證責任倒置因果關係事實真偽不明RCA CaseBurden of ProofReverse Burden of ProofCausationnNon-liquet
刊名 月旦法學雜誌
出版單位 元照出版公司
期數 201606 (253期)
DOI 10.3966/102559312016060253004  複製DOI  DOI申請
QRCode
 



讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄