月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
篇名
評析減免沒收條款
並列篇名
Review on the Reduction of Criminal Confiscation Law
作者 薛智仁
中文摘要 沒收新法參考德國立法例於刑法第三八條之二第二項增訂減免沒收條款,主要係考量沒收作為干預財產權的刑事制裁,應遵守憲法之比例原則。此一立法目的值得肯定,但是一體適用於所有的沒收型態,忽略違禁物、犯罪工具產物與不法所得沒收之目的與性質相異,立法技術上過於粗糙。此外,其所規定之減免沒收事由內涵模糊,能否透過學說與實務的累積逐步具體化,則有待觀察。在無法期待短期內再度修法的情況下,本文建議根據各種沒收型態之目的與性質,具體確定法定減免沒收事由的重要性與意義。
英文摘要 The recent amendment of the confiscation law has adopted the idea of confiscation reduction from German Criminal Law s38-2(b). The main concern is that, confiscation, as a criminal sanction which intervenes people’s property rights, should comply with the proportionality requirement. The legislative purpose of confiscation reduction is agreeable. However, the legislative techniques needs to be adjusted because the same criteria of reduction is applied to all cases, and the contents of reduction are vague. Concerning that the re-amendment is not possible in the near future, this article suggests that we should establish the importance and concrete meaning of the legitimate causes of reduction base on the different purposes of types of confiscation.
起訖頁 63-83
關鍵詞 沒收減免沒收過苛比例原則訴訟經濟ConfiscationReduction of ConfiscationToo HarshProportionality RequirementLitigation Economy
刊名 月旦法學雜誌
出版單位 元照出版公司
期數 201605 (252期)
DOI 10.3966/102559312016050252004  複製DOI  DOI申請
QRCode
 



讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄