本文旨在探討國民政府撤遷來臺後，相關退除役官兵的空間安置計畫。整體安置計畫的肇始，乃因軍民身分的區分與各種相應而生的主事單位，而有不同的安置計畫。首先，本文將進行國府遷臺後退輔制度下的安置計畫脈絡分析，說明安置機構轉變與計畫內容對應的關係。在退輔會成立後初期關於榮民的安置計畫討論中，本文將從榮民之家的醫療安置，以及榮民的農場就業安置兩方面分別進行分析。其次，針對非隨國府撤遷來臺的不同身分稱謂的軍民，探討相對應的各種安置計畫方式與內容為何。本文發現由於各種撤遷來臺之軍民存在明顯的社會文化差異，國府的安置計畫主要是依據身分的區分進行不同的集體安置。而相應這樣的安置計畫選址，其實隱含有「社會隔離」的意味。在結論上，作者認為這個集體性的安置計畫，區位性選擇、距離性的考慮，以及社會秩序維護等空間部署，表徵了安置對象是如何在各種規訓技術下被安排，從而實現身體的空間化；更是被國家藉由來穩定地方社會的秩序，劃定嚴格的人口層級，並進行各種族群的管理監控，以及各方面社會區隔的手段。安置計畫的同時也使得這些對象在其所臣服之集體社會制度的配置裡顯現出來，即將人們「安置在特定的位置」。

This article examines the spatial resettlement programs implemented for demobilized and retired servicemen following the relocation of the Nationalist Government to Taiwan. These programs emerged from distinctions between military and civilian statuses and were administered by different authorities, resulting in diverse resettlement strategies. First, the study traces the development of resettlement policies under the veterans’ assistance system after 1949, analyzing how institutional changes shaped the content and form of resettlement planning. Focusing on the early period after the establishment of the Veterans Affairs Council, it analyzes two major approaches: medical resettlement through veterans’ homes and employment resettlement through agricultural farms. Second, the article explores the resettlement arrangements applied to various groups of military personnel and civilians of differing status designations who did not accompany the Nationalist Government’s relocation to Taiwan. The study finds that, given the pronounced socio-cultural differences among these populations, resettlement policies were primarily organized around status-based distinctions and implemented through forms of collective resettlement. The selection of resettlement sites implicitly entailed processes of social segregation. In conclusion, the article argues that these collective resettlement programs—through their spatial positioning and distance-based considerations—functioned as disciplinary technologies that spatialized bodies, stabilized local social order, delineated population hierarchies, and enabled state management, surveillance, and social differentiation by placing individuals in specific, regulated locations.