Slate houses are a key symbol of the traditional material culture of the Rukai and Paiwan peoples. In a contemporary society increasingly focused on the coexistence of diverse cultures, reconstructing these traditional stone houses has become a crucial step in revitalizing their culture. In recent years, the concept of gendered anthropomorphic stone structures has gained traction in museums and guided tours. This clear distinction between male and female stones has captured public curiosity and often serves as a focal point for interpretations of slate house architecture. This article examines whether this cultural practice of gendered stone anthropomorphism existed in the distribution of Rukai and Paiwan slate house architecture during the traditional period, and explores the possible reasons for its widespread prevalence and variations in interpretation. Preliminary conclusions suggest that the concept of gendered stone anthropomorphism likely originated primarily in the Ailao River basin, encompassing the Ailao group of the Rukai and the Lawal group of the Paiwan. This may be related to the regional cultural custom of valuing male children and having the eldest son inherit the family property, as opposed to the eldest son inherited as is common among other Paiwan people. In recent years, driven by cultural revitalization, cultural tourism, and the rapid spread of diverse media, the concept of gendered stone identification has become increasingly popular across regions. This increasingly popular concept of male and female stone possesses a binary gender distinction, and while the anthropomorphic metaphors are relatively easy to understand, the associated material and lithological characteristics, scope of application, and cultural connections have yet to develop a corresponding logical connection. This may be due to differing perspectives on the material and lithological properties, leading to a lack of consensus on the underlying interpretations and resulting in divergent interpretations. The preservation of regional differences is the foundation of cultural diversity. We should consider that during traditional tribal societies, the grand traditions of indigenous communities were composed of countless smaller traditions, each with its own local patterns. While tribes shared common cultural roots, their destinies diverged. Preserving local characteristics is an important means of showcasing cultural diversity. Contemporary cultural displays and related interpretations should not excessively cross-regionally reference, resulting in homogenized presentations that undermine the distinctive regional characteristics of the culture.