本研究目的為探討台灣整體衛浴設計應用，解析其組成系統，提出集合住宅整體衛浴品質認證指標之評估架構，建立量化評估系統模式，提供國內整體衛浴產品應用於集合住宅之品質認證評估依據，並作為未來建築設計時之決策依據。透過模糊德爾菲法(FDM)設定評估指標與因子，隨後利用層級分析法(AHP)建立權重關係，並導入失效模式與分級制度，建構一套完整之評估模式，其中囊括4大指標包含安全堅固(SS)、合理完善(RC)、健康衛生(HS)、舒適永續(CS)，以及16項延伸因子，並將評估總分(UI)設定為常見之百分制，並將60分以下定為不合格，60分至79分為合格級，80分以上為優級．另外，設定評估門檻指標與失效因子，以增加認證評估系統的可靠性。最終為確保認證評估之可行性，本研究將評估模式延伸至傳統衛浴，擴大搜集實際衛浴案例，以蒐集足夠樣本深入探討評估結果的鑑別性與合理性，並藉由蒙地卡羅法模擬大量數據，預測大樣本下之分布驗證．其結果顯示約33.7%的案例處於不合格區段，優級區段則約為9.4%，判斷評估模式具有鑑別性，隨後並檢核失效門檻指標與因子在實際案例上之應用情況，最終透過評估結果判斷本研究設定之失效模式具有檢核效力。

The study employs the fuzzy Delphi method to set evaluation indicators and factors, followed by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to establish weighting relationships, incorporating failure modes and a grading system to construct a comprehensive evaluation model. This includes four main indicators: Safety and Sturdy (SS), Reasonable and Completeness (RC), Health and Sanitary (HS), Comfortable and Sustainable (CS), along with sixteen factors. The overall score (UI) is calculated on a common percentage scale, with scores below 60 deemed unqualified, between 60 and 79 as qualified, and above 80 as excellent. Threshold indicators and failure factors are set to ensure the model’s viability. Demonstrated through actual case evaluations, the model’s strengths and weaknesses are reviewed, extending the evaluation to traditional bathrooms for a deeper examination of the discriminatory and rational aspects of the results. Monte Carlo simulations of large data sets reveal approximately 33.7% of cases fall into the unqualified range, and about 9.4% into the excellent range, indicating the model’s discriminative ability. Both threshold indicators and failure factors play a critical role in case evaluations.