整建住宅在臺灣二戰後的都市發展與住宅空間的需求有其時代意義，而其自力增建的空間型態與構造方式，更進一步地再現從戰後到1996 年「臺北市政府當前取締違建措施」實施以前台灣常民對於住宅需求延伸。本研究以風土與現代構造史的角度分析自力增建的構造型態、以及建築型態學分析整宅與增建後的空間紋理，給予庶民空間的規劃與延伸一種新的理解方式。 藉由歸納當時整建住宅的自立增建在方向性、公私領域、空間延伸使用的空間型態，以及增建組構的基礎、垂直支撐、圍閉系統、與遮蔽頂蓋的構成型態，本研究意圖釐清整建住宅原始設計所提供的自力增建的基礎，了解量體配置形成的天井、以及立面陽台、雨遮這些元素，成為自力增建在空間和構造型態的基礎。同時了解自力增建的構造型態、支持增建空間型態需求的方式。並進一步了解透過風土建築對於社會協調的共識與規則，來了解自力增建的空間；另認知自力增建的持續增改建，是風土建築所認知的變遷形式。期待能藉由本研究，給予乍看下複雜的整建住宅自力增建，一個可以理解的認知途徑。

The resettlement housing represented the urban development and the residential requirements of the era after the Second World War. The spatial patterns and construction methods of self-built extensions of the housing further signified the ordinary people’s additional needs for residences after WWII until the introduction of the ‘Current Measure of Clamping Down on Illegal Construction of Taipei City’ in 1996. This research has taken the view of vernacular and modern construction history to analyze the tectonic morphology of self-construction and the spatial contexts of resettlement housings and their extension. The aim of this research is to provide an alternative understanding of planning and extension of ordinary people’s spaces. By inducing self-built extensions from spatial morphology of orientation, public and private areas, and spatial uses, and from tectonic morphology of foundation, vertical supports, enclosures, and top covering, this study attempted to clarify the foundation of self-construction from the original housing designs, such as atriums, the balconies, or canopies. Moreover, it is also crucial to reveal the tectonic morphology of self-construction to support the needs of spatial morphology. This will further provide the background to see the agreement and regulation of social coordination and the changes in the view of vernacular architecture. This research would provide a comprehensive method to understand the self-construction of resettlement housing.