數位主權的規範意涵：觀念論

Normative Implications of Digital Sovereignty: Conceptual Framework

數位時代下的AI社會，演算法長驅直入各個角落，人類的知識獲取、溝通交易、經驗分享以及身分表徵，逐步轉型成為數位模式。人們面對諸多新興事物，在來不及命名的當下，急智湧現而出各種概念與用詞，令人目不暇給，其中digital sovereignty或data sovereignty等概念，格外搶眼，難以忽視，問題是：這些概念意指為何？法律的問題性何在？為什麼我們（法律人）需要這些概念？是否蘊含新的規範意涵與權利功能？以上是本文之作所欲探討的主要法律問題，筆者試著在「資料經濟」或「數位經濟」的脈絡下透過圖解回答之，並進行概念與規範的辯證，解構問題面向與可能的規範需求，最後指出數位轉型下人權的受危狀態，以供反思。

In the AI society in the digital era, algorithms are advancing into every corner, and human knowledge acquisition, communication and transactions, experience sharing, and identity representation are gradually transforming into digital models. Faced with many emerging things, people have no time to name them, and various concepts and terms have emerged quickly, which is dizzying. Among them, concepts such as digital sovereignty or data sovereignty are particularly eye-catching and difficult to ignore. The question is: What do these concepts mean? What does it mean? What is the problem with the law? Why do we (lawyers) need these concepts? Does it contain new normative implications and rights functions? The above are the main legal issues that this article intends to explore. The author tries to answer them through illustrations in the context of“data economy”or“digital economy”, and conducts a dialectical discussion of concepts and norms to deconstruct the problem orientation and possible norms. needs, and finally points out the endangered status of human rights under digital transformation for reflection.