數字時代公共服務行政法構建的法理及進路

數字時代公共服務發展表現為公共服務數字化改造與數字公共服務創新，二者助推數字政府職能從秩序行政向服務行政延伸，凸顯構建公共服務行政法的緊迫性。數字時代公共服務行政法構建的法理支撐在於，依託權利與義務相統一、權的制度邊界設定、合法性與有效性相協調、服務權利的程序保障，在服務供給中促進分配正義、秩序建構、服務本位和動態調控。技術創新與應用中的合作共治，以及融入高質量發展格局，推動服務標準化建設，奠定公共服務行政法的治理語境和框架思路。公共服務行政法的基本原則應契合守成與創新並行的邏輯。其體系構造應以構建基本法及對數字化問題作出專章規定，進而統籌各領域公共服務的數字化立法為主線。以公法與私法、正式規範與非正式規範融合適用推動規範體系整體擴容，並通過明確、服務範圍、主體功能、創新邊界、系統規劃、歸責機制等破解數字化服務供給的制度困境，有利於勾勒數字時代公共服務行政法治建設的制度圖景。

The development of public services in the digital age is characterized by the digital transformation of public services and the innovation of new digital public services. Both aspects contribute to the shift of digital government functions from order administration to service administration, highlighting the urgency of constructing public service administrative law. This law is based on principles such as the unity of rights and obligations, the establishment of institutional boundaries for power, the coordination of legitimacy and effectiveness, and procedural safeguards for service rights. These principles aim to promote distributive justice, order construction, service orientation, and dynamic regulation in service provision. Cooperative governance in technological innovation and application, along with integration into high-quality development patterns, push forward the standardization of services, laying the groundwork for the governance context and framework of public service administrative law. The basic principles of public service administrative law should follow a parallel path of maintaining the status quo and innovating. This involves building basic laws and making specific provisions for digital issues, coordinating digital legislation in various public service areas as a main approach to its system construction. The integration and application of public law with private law, formal norms with informal norms, aim to expand the regulatory system comprehensively. By clarifying service scope, subject functions, innovation boundaries, system planning, and accountability mechanisms, it’s possible to address the institutional dilemmas of digital service provision. This is conducive to outlining the institutional landscape of administrative law construction in public service in the digital age.