月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
醫藥、科技與法律 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
被偷走的人工流產自由:「多布斯訴傑克森女性健康組織案」之國際人權法律評析
並列篇名
The Stolen Freedoms of Abortion: An International Human Rights Analysis of the Dobbs Case
作者 李柏翰 (Po-Han Lee)張竹芩
中文摘要
本文回顧從1973年的「羅訴韋德案」到2022年的「多布斯訴傑克森女性健康組織案」之發展,後者以所謂原旨主義論點否認了美國憲法已承認了近半世紀的人工流產自由及相關權利。在進步與保守勢力間的文化戰爭中,控制女人身體與生育的權力長期以來一直是與種族和性別不平等交織的問題。透過國際人權分析—尤其有鑑於不歧視、不倒退及所有人權相互關聯等原則—我們認為美國最高法院否認人工流產自由係不正當的,惟該不正當性是否構成違法性,取決於在條約及習慣國際人權法下美國所承擔的法律義務之理解與解釋。就此,我們亦觀察美國對「國際」人權制度之態度轉變與分歧,及其對國際和國內社會的影響。藉由「後羅時代」相對較短的時期內可獲得之所有證據,我們認為,美國最高法院剝奪了此項自由也負面影響了許多生活在美國境內外婦女和女童的人生,因此美國嚴重違反了國際人權法,更可能進一步推波助瀾當下襲捲全球的反性別運動及反人權運動。
英文摘要
This article begins by reviewing the development of Roe v. Wade in 1973 to Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization in 2022, which applied an originalist perspective to deny the freedom of abortion and the related right to entitlements that had existed and been recognised for nearly half a century in the US Constitution. In the culture war between progressive and conservative forces, the power to control women’s bodies and reproduction has long been a problem of intersectional politics intertwined with racial and gender inequalities. Through an international human rights analysis–particularly in light of the principles of nondiscrimination, non-regression, and the interrelatedness between all human rights–we consider illegitimate the US Supreme Court’s denial of abortion rights. However, whether such illegitimacy amounts to illegality depends on the understanding and interpretation of the legal obligations of the US under conventional and customary international human rights law. We thus elaborate on the changes and divisiveness regarding the US approach to the‘international’human rights regime and its impact on international and domestic planes. With all the evidence available in the relatively short period of the“post-Roe era”, we argue that the Supreme Court’s denial of abortion rights has also stolen the lives of many women and girls living in and beyond the US and, therefore, the US has seriously violated international human rights law, potentially fuelling the global anti-gender movement and anti-human rights movement.
起訖頁 93-146
關鍵詞 消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約經濟社會文化權利國際公約不歧視不倒退生育健康及權利羅訴韋德案人工流產Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against WomenInternational Covenant on EconomicSocial and Cultural Rightsnon-discrimination; non-retrogressionreproductive health and rightsRoe v. Wadeabortion
刊名 醫藥、科技與法律  
期數 202304 (28:1期)
出版單位 國立清華大學科技法律研究所;臺灣醫事法律學會;臺北醫學大學醫療暨生物科技法律研究所
該期刊-上一篇 新冠肺炎流行期間國籍航空機師提審案件之分析
該期刊-下一篇 親自驗屍義務之歷史、現況與相關醫學檢查之發展
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄