英文摘要 |
This essay analyzes the background and theory of hybrid courts by reviewingUnited Nation documents. In addition, the methodology of this essay followsthe case study method. The cases under examination in this essay focus on theSpecial Panels for Serious Crimes in East Timor, Regulation 64 Panels in theCourts of Kosovo, Special Court for Sierra Leone, Extraordinary Chambers inthe Courts of Cambodia, Special Tribunal for Lebanon, and Extraordinary AfricanChambers. The main findings of this essay are: (1) in post-conflict states,society will be more harmonious by achieving transnational justice, which is abenefit of employing the hybrid court; (2) the hybrid court is a key legal tool torebuild the domestic judicial system of post-conflict states; (3) by integrating adifferent judicial system, the hybrid court will allow for new forms of prosecutingserious crimes in international criminal law. |