司法互助域外送達採用電子直接送達之優勢探討

Discussion on the Advantages of Electronic Direct Service Abroad in Mutual Legal Assistance

科技日漸發達，以往紙本的傳輸漸漸被電子傳輸所取代。本文在此背景下，研究電子送達與紙本送達的比較與優缺點。
電子送達未必能完全取代紙本送達的缺點。但是大部分的紙本送達可能導致的致命傷害在電子送達可以克服。
我國尚未規範司法互助域外電子送達或科技送達方式。然而電子送達方式將是未來趨勢，故本文介紹電子送達之優勢，並且比較傳統紙本送達方式之優劣。
本文以非常細緻的方式比較司法互助採用傳統紙本送達與電子送達。有些狀況是有實務案例的真實狀況才被揭發出來，而彰顯到司法互助使用域外電子送達之實益。
司法互助域外送達採用紙本與電子送達兩者相比較之下，電子送達之優點似乎多於缺點，用於現代科技與時效上，也漸漸較切合時代需求和生活習慣。故本文推薦域外送達採用電子送達。
本文也論述早期司法互助未能採用直接送達的主權疑慮、原因，以及後續發展情形，還有我國的實務判決想法。

With the development of science and technology, the transmission of paper in the past has gradually been replaced by electronic transmission. In this context, this article studies the comparison, advantages and disadvantages of electronic delivery and paper delivery.
The Electronic means of service abroad may not completely replace the means of paper service in mutual assistance. However, most of the fatal shortcomings that may be caused by paper delivery can be overcome by electronic delivery.
There is no regulation about the mean of electronic or theological service abroad. However, the electronic delivery will be the future trend, so this article introduces the advantages of electronic delivery and compares the advantages and disadvantages of traditional paper delivery.
This article compares the traditional paper service and electronic service of mutual legal assistance in a very nuanced way. Some situations are only revealed when there are real cases in practice, and the benefits of using extraterritorial electronic service for mutual legal assistance are demonstrated. Comparing the use of paper and electronic service for mutual legal assistance, electronic service seems to have more advantages than disadvantages. It is used in modern technology and timeliness, and it is gradually more in line with the needs of the times and living habits. Therefore, this article recommends electronic delivery for outof-territory delivery.
This article also discusses the sovereign concerns, reasons, and subsequent development of the early mutual legal assistance failure to use direct service, as well as our country’s practical judgment ideas.