英文摘要 |
On 26 Jan 2011, the amendment of hospice palliative care act of Taiwan was issued, which allows unconscious terminally ill patients to have the rights to get ventilators and other life-supporting systems withdrawn with the consent of their families and the approval of ethics committee of the hospital. We have presented a female patient with terminal breast cancer, who received tracheal intubation due to intractable seizure. She never regained consciousness and developed liver failure after the intubation. To protect her best interest and respect for autonomy, compassionate extubation was done for the poor prognosis after discussion with her families. The patient died peacefully at home with the accompany of her families in stead of being hospitalized at the intensive care unit. Before the amendment of hospice palliative care act of Taiwan, the con.icts between patient's autonomy and law were often because it lacked the law origin basis to withdraw ventilators and other life-supporting systems on a unconscious terminal ill patient without a advance care planning or a medical surrogate even if medical futility was evident. The ethical and legal concerns before and after the amendment were explored in the article. The possible dif.culties in spite of the amendment were also discussed. The main suggestions of the article were to encourage Taiwanese to issue the advance care planning and medical surrogate to diminish the ethical and legal dilemma. |